Trust Profiles

Trust is earned.
Even by agents.

You would not hire a new employee and give them the keys to the kingdom on day one. AI agents should earn autonomy the same way: through maturity, access discipline, consistent behavior, and provable compliance.

THE PROFILE

A trust score is not a label. It is a living profile.

Iron Gorilla continuously scores each agent from the evidence it leaves behind: what it can access, what it actually uses, how often it complies, who changed it, and whether its runtime behavior still matches its baseline.

Low Trust
New, drifting, or high-risk agents receive tighter limits, deeper inspection, and human review before consequential actions proceed.
Medium Trust
Normal inline enforcement for agents with enough signal to operate, but not enough history to reduce scrutiny.
High Trust
Proven agents can receive broader autonomy, fewer checkpoints, and faster approvals while policy still runs in the background.
OVER 50 VARIABLES, GROUPED BY RISK

What goes into the score?

Over 50 variables feed the proprietary scoring model. We expose the categories and representative signals your teams need to reason about autonomy, while keeping exact weights and secret-sauce variables intentionally undisclosed.

Trust ProfileScoring...
  • Static posture1
  • Policy compliance2
  • Behavioral detection3
  • Upstream MCP risk4
  • Human stewardship5
Static postureage, access, permission use
Policy compliancepasses, blocks, DLP outcomes
Behavioral detectiondisk, network, tool patterns
Upstream MCP riskage, recency, provenance
Human stewardshipmaintainers and change history
Keep scrolling
RUNTIME AUTONOMY

Trust changes what happens before the agent acts.

The score is not a vanity metric. It is an enforcement input. Iron Gorilla uses trust to decide when an agent can move quickly, when it needs heavier inspection, and when a human must approve the next step.

High-trust agents earn speed

Known agents with clean histories and stable behavior can clear routine actions with fewer checkpoints, while hard policy remains enforced.

Medium-trust agents stay supervised

Standard inline evaluation continues across policy, data handling, connector use, and audit capture until the agent earns more autonomy.

Low-trust agents get contained

New agents, risky integrations, unusual disk or network activity, and behavioral drift can trigger reduced permissions, deeper scanning, or human approval.

WHY IT IS DIFFERENT

Static controls tell you what was configured. Trust tells you what has been earned.

Not static RBAC

Roles and permissions describe what an agent may attempt. Trust Profiles measure whether it has earned the autonomy to attempt more.

Not policy alone

Policy answers whether an action is allowed. Trust adds context about whether this agent, at this moment, should receive fast approval or deeper scrutiny.

Not post-event audit

Audit explains what happened after the fact. Trust Profiles change enforcement before the action executes.

Iron Gorilla combines static posture, real-time behavior, compliance history, and integration risk so autonomy decisions are measurable, explainable, and enforceable.
COMPLIANCE-DRIVEN AUTONOMY

Regulated organizations can let agents do more when trust is visible.

Banks can let proven agents handle more routine investigations. Healthcare teams can separate normal care coordination from risky PHI movement. Insurers can accelerate clean claims without relaxing controls. Government and defense teams can demand attribution before autonomy expands.

Least privilege first
Behavioral baseline next
Connector risk included
Autonomy earned over time

See how trust profiles change agent autonomy in real time.

Bring the agent you want to deploy. We will show how trust, policy, behavior, and audit combine before it acts.